Amidst the
conflict and chaos in Syria, doctors are struggling to stay safe and organized
in their efforts to effectively provide needed care. In fact, one of the most surprising and
devastating aspects of the Syrian conflict has been the deliberate targeting of
medical facilities and medical personnel, through which more than 100 doctors
have been killed and over 600 doctors have been imprisoned. This has caused many doctors to flee, and the
ones that remain must work amidst a failing healthcare system where nearly
forty percent of the hospitals have been destroyed. They must literally risk their lives to meet
the healthcare needs of their country.
After
events such as bombings, the doctors are part of the first wave of support for
the victims of the conflict, and as such are amongst the first informed about
the details of the attack. This brings
into light ethical issues that doctors must face when they learn about who was
responsible for a bombing or chemical warfare attack and when they discover the
brutal details of the attack. Many of
the doctors, especially those working for international volunteer or
humanitarian organizations such as Doctors Without Borders, attempt to stay politically
neutral, and therefore struggle with how to deal with the information they
glean and who to share it with.
This past
August, Doctors Without Borders got word from some of its partner hospitals of
a significant number of patients entering hospitals with “neurotoxic symptoms,”
such as would result from chemical warfare.
This group of doctors struggled with how to deal with this information,
as sharing it might place them in the political position of siding with the
rebels and facing government retaliation, and in addition the information could
be used by Western governments as grounds for military action, but ultimately
the doctors decided to make a public statement.
In this statement, they made sure to clarify that they could “neither scientifically confirm the cause
of these symptoms nor establish who is responsible for the attack,” and asked
for an independent investigation.
However, shortly thereafter White House press secretary Jay Carney and
Secretary of State John F. Kerry started citing these findings as enough
evidence to warrant military intervention, just as the doctors had feared.
While publicizing these findings
placed these doctors in a political position, making the knowledge public
allowed this human rights issue to enter the international agenda and to become
a major topic of discussion all over the world.
Doctors have played a big role in bringing international attention to
the human rights violations occurring in Syria, and arguably deserve more
credit than they receive. In fact, it
was through samples collected by a local Syrian doctor that the US was able to declare
confirmation of the use of chemical weapons by the Syrian government. As the doctors risk their lives to provide
medical treatment, they also face the issue of politicizing themselves by
sharing critical information that could potentially cause global conflict, but
could also help to reduce the human rights issues occurring in Syria.
No comments:
Post a Comment