By
now, I'm sure everyone is aware of the usage of chemical weapons by Syrian authorities
on their own citizens, so I won't bore you with the same details that have been
covered already in previous blogs. This is more of a follow-up combined with
some personal input on the situation.
Within
the past week, several articles have cropped up around the Syrian humanitarian
crisis, regarding a nun, Mother Agnes Mariam, living in Syria and her report on
what she considers to be a staged video of the August 21st sarin gas attack in
Damascus. She is not questioning whether the attack actually occurred; the body
count and symptoms of the victims are irrefutable. Rather, she questions the
severity of the situation that the video portrays. The footage largely shows
several different scenes of emaciated individuals, mainly children, lying in
makeshift hospital cots, after having inhaled the poisonous gas. Having
scrutinized the video and even submitted a report to the UN, she points out
possible discrepancies in the video, such as seeing the same child in multiple
shots that were supposed to be different locations or finding a lack of women
or parents alongside their children in the hospitals. The absence of evidence
of burials was another factor she outlined that would suggest doctored footage.
The
main question at hand is the credibility of Mother Agnes. This video is referenced
as one of the main windows for the outside world to look into this humanitarian
crisis. The issue with this fact, though, is that it is one of the few windows
available, and so it's hard to tell if it's tainted or not. Oftentimes, news can
be taken as the complete truth because it is the only version of the truth out
there. Thus, there is a possibility that Mother Agnes is right. Video
manipulation, or finding someone who can alter a video, is not a particularly
difficult task, and for people in the business of pushing political agendas
(like President Assad and Syrian officials, or really any government), this is
one of the main weapons in their arsenals. If Mother Agnes is speaking the
truth, then this provides a perfect example of how technology can be abused
because the US nearly found itself in another military conflict (remember
President Obama's speech to Congress several weeks ago?). Even if she is wrong,
it is obvious that the power of video footage and even the way the clips might
be pasted together can be effective in producing a certain response. This was
evidenced by the international backlash towards Syria along with the UN
Security Council's passage of a motion on Wednesday to immediately initiate
humanitarian aid to the Syrian citizens. It would be an interesting argument of
whether or not the right to the truth would be considered a basic human right.
To me, it seems more part of an unwritten code of ethics, but when did politics ever really care for ethics?
http://www.nytimes.com/2013/09/22/world/middleeast/seeking-credible-denial-on-poison-gas-russia-and-syria-turn-to-nun.html?pagewanted=all
http://www.globalresearch.ca/mother-agnes-mariam-attacked-by-human-rights-watch-hrw-lies-for-the-us-government/5352547
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-middle-east-24358543
http://abcnews.go.com/US/wireStory/diplomats-back-syria-humanitarian-access-20444294?page=2
No comments:
Post a Comment