Last spring, protests grew out of more modest demonstrations
in Turkey after the government planned on the construction of a shopping mall
on Gezi Park in Istanbul. To counteract these protests, the government ended up
using over 130,000 tear gas cartridges over the span of 20 days of protest,
killing five and leaving thousands of people injured. The riot police were
noted to have used tear gas, rubber bullets, and water cannons, and Prime
Minister Erdogan was widely criticized for what happened.
According to a report
released last week, over 11,000 protesters nationwide were exposed to tear gas
for up to eight hours a day over the course of several days during the protest.
Almost 40 percent of the total protesters complained of having serious
repercussions from their exposure to tear gas, including respiratory problems,
allergic reactions, high blood pressure, hearing loss, and skin rashes.
While the government argues that the protests groups were
actually members of terrorist groups in Istanbul, the rest of the world sees
chemical weapons as a huge issue. Just as we are seeing in Syria, the use of
chemical weapons can have serious and detrimental effects on the lives of
people. In Syria, the chemical weapons used were more deadly, but tear gas used
by the Turkish police is leading to serious effects on the lives of protesters.
The excess amount of tear gas is a clear example of human rights’ violations,
when the protesters were only trying to voice a freedom of speech and opinion
about the creation of a shopping mall. It was completely unnecessary for the
government to think that they needed to use tear gas and other weapons to fend
off protesters.
This past Tuesday, President Abdullah Gul gave a speech at
the United Nations General Assembly, praising the environmental concerns that the
protesters had for the construction, but then suggested that the New York
police would have responded the same way if the protesters had shut down the
city center. Unless the protesters posed as a threat to the lives of police
officers and government officials, there is no reason to enforce weaponry that
could have long term effects on citizens. The Ministry of Health of Turkey also
submitted a draft bill noting that any medical worker who assists the wounded
without previous government authorization would be subject to consequences and
potential imprisonment. This is another outrageous step taken by the government
to have further control of the situation, months after the event took place.
Hopefully a voice will be given to the Turkish
people that are suffering from the protests several months ago. Threatening the
medical workers who are doing their job may put an end to any emergency medical
assistance for anyone in Istanbul. As of now, the bill has not been passed, but
Parliament is set to reconvene sometime this month to discuss it. It would be
unfortunate for those who were affected by the tear gas to continue to not have
a voice against their government, and have to live in fear of their own right
to speech.http://www.nytimes.com/2013/09/26/world/europe/turkish-protesters-are-still-said-to-be-ailing-from-tear-gas.html?ref=freedomandhumanrights
No comments:
Post a Comment