"Zimbabwe: A Human Rights Agenda for President Mugabe | Human Rights Watch."HRW.com. Human Rights Watch, 04 Sept. 2013. Web. 06 Sept. 2013. <http://www.hrw.org/news/2013/09/04/zimbabwe-human-rights-agenda-president-mugabe>.
http://www.hrw.org/news/2013/09/04/zimbabwe-human-rights-agenda-president-mugabe
Overshadowed by the events occurring in Syria and North
Korea, the citizens of the south African country, Zimbabwe, have been subjected
to dire human rights violations for the greater part of the past four
decades. Basic needs such as food and
shelter are unavailable to much of the public; whenever human rights defenders
try to make a public statement, they are brutally beaten on the streets by the
local police force; and in a controversial election, President Mugabe has been
re-elected to his authoritarian seat in government. As a result of these serious abuses, the
Human Rights Watch has written a letter detailing the actions that Mugabe
should take regarding the welfare of his people. The move by the Human Rights Watch seems bold
since the government of Zimbabwe has actually accused the United States of
similar abuse citing the Iraqi War, only illustrating the corruption found in
their government. Because of the current situation of Zimbabwe, this plea will
only fall on deaf ears, as the current government isn’t taking any
responsibility for their citizens.
Although Obama has made a statement to take action in Zimbabwe as their
actions “pose a continuing, unusual and extraordinary threat to the foreign
policy of the United States”, the American government has not done anything
significant to stop the Mugabe regime with the exception of the sanctions
imposed by Bush about a decade ago. Until the government undergoes new, more
benevolent rule with the death of Mugabe or the some outside force such as the
United Nations or the United States takes real action, the people of Zimbabwe
will continue to suffer under the hands of their tyrannical government. The most probable reason for the absence of
intervention from other countries or international organizations would be the
fact that Zimbabwe truly doesn’t pose a threat to the world. Unlike North Korea
or Syria, Zimbabwe doesn’t possess any significant chemical or nuclear weapons
so as a result, the only action really taken against the corrupt administration
would be those that report the abuses such as the Human Rights Watch and the
Zimbabwe Human Rights Commission. Unfortunately, it seems like, for an extended
period of time, Zimbabwe will continue to take a back seat with Syria and North
Korea being the primary threats to the United States. This situation only
exemplifies the ongoing struggle to accommodate the problems existing around
the world since so many countries have become so dysfunctional due to governments
like that of Zimbabwe. Now the question
for those living under the tyranny of Mugabe will be whether or not anyone will
ever take action, from within or outside of the country, to restore the
fundamental freedoms that every human should have and can the entire world rid
itself of such corrupt ideals? One can only hope.
As Obama said in his speech last night, we can't intervene in every human rights abuse in the world. But that leaves a very big question - how do we choose? Why don't we intervene in Zimbabwe? What do you think the reasons are?
ReplyDelete