With today's technology we have achieved so much, our whole
life quality has changed dramatically in the past couple of years, everything
has become more accessible and easier, it also helps us connect with people
from all around world, but can technology do harm?
Well when it comes to satellite imagery the subject is debatable.
Satellite imagery has helped country's violate human rights, it was only
recently published that in the 1980s when Iraq was at war against Iran, the US
sent satellite imagery to Iraqi forces in order for them to plan future
chemical attacks against Iran. So we can see how satellite imagery can help
violate human rights, but can it help to protect them too?
Well a Yale study was able to identify certain genocides occurring
at Darfur by interpreting images of changes in vegetation in the region. Actor
George Clooney has joined forces with the anti- genocide activists to launch
the "Satellite Sentinel Project" which tracks human rights violations
as they happen throughout the world; Clooney has called it "the
antigenocide paparazzi". We can see how the same technology can be used
for two opposite purposes, that's why I think we as human beings need to
channel our efforts to use technology in order to make our planet better off,
technology will never stop to evolve, but technology is a neutral item, the way
you decide to use technology is what counts, and in my opinion our main focus
as human beings should be using technology to prevent further human rights
violations.
.
Yes, this is a very interesting question. It's the HOW to technology that counts the most. But I also wonder if it's even possible to totally stop "bad" uses of technology. Guns both protect and kill. But we know that part of protecting someone can mean killing someone else when we use a gun. Satellite images can help, but they also hurt. Could we even know how they help if they didn't hurt as well?
ReplyDelete