The leaders of a Bangladeshi human
rights organization, Odhikar, were recently detained. One of them, Mr. Adilur
Rahman Khan, Secretary of Odhikar and a member of the World Organization
against Torture General Assembly, was arrested on August 10th and
charged on September 12th for
“[distorting] images by using photo shop and publishing a fabricated report, which
enraged public sentiment,” under Section 57 of the Information and
Communication Technology (ICT) Act. However, these charges were inaccurate
because Khan was merely portraying a gruesome situation that occurred last May
when law enforcement agencies killed 61 people in Dhaka. In retaliation the
police urged the Metropolitan Magistrate Court to frame charges against Khan and
the Director of Odhikar, Mr. Nasiruddin Elan, who will be indicted in the near
future. Unfortunately, these two men, who had been fighting for human rights
since 1994, were treated like criminals, even though they sought out justice.
I find it absurd and inhumane that a
government silenced its opposition – a human rights organization, one that aids
and protects its people by uncovering and displaying real problems with the country’s
police and government. The role technology played in Khan’s indictment was
crucial. While beneficial to the spread of the truth, technology singled Khan
out as a key voice in the human rights movement, due to the articles he posted
online on Odhikar’s website. Thus, technology, though crucial to the
development of Khan’s organization, was a major contributing factor to his
imprisonment.
Although this event may seem
insignificant in the larger scheme of global human rights violations, it is
symbolic of the actions taken by all preexisting and extant totalitarian
governments. Other countries, such as North Korea and the former Soviet Union, have
also taken aggressive and oftentimes disastrous measures to silence their
outspoken adversaries. Consequently, the voices of truth are dimmed, as the
rights of human beings and their freedom of speech is taken away from them by
the oppressive regimes in which they live.
Links:
Interesting post, Iris about the advantages and disadvantages of technology. While the web spreads information widely and quickly, it can't control what certain people will do with that information. In this case, the information was used against the human rights activist. This is why the web is so tricky when it comes to human rights. It brings into question so many things - how can information be verified? How can it stay unaltered?
ReplyDelete